I can't believe it's been a whole month since I started trying out Google Reader (GR) full time. I wanted to see if I could live in a browser-based aggregator, and was curious about how far it had come since the early days.
The short version is: it's less efficient at reading boatloads of feeds and items. But, the always-on, available-anywhere design of GR makes it worthwhile.
The long version is, well, longer. I still much of the niceties of BlogBridge (BB). Things like having a "photo gallery" view, for viewing images in feeds (I subscribe to a fair number of Flickr tag feeds, so this is quite handy). I've got a workaround for the star ratings that BB uses - I've created two "tags" in GR: "5-stars" and "4-stars" and have applied them to appropriate feeds. That definitely helps prioritize reading important stuff from all of my feeds/tags without having to hunt for them. Because it's browser based, I can use native del.icio.us interfaces, so that feature from BB isn't missed. The most annoying thing I've found with GR isn't directly GR's fault. I have to do a fair bit of clicking to get through all of my tags. I need to do some more work to add appropriate feeds to "5-stars", "4-stars", "3-stars" etc... so I can focus on levels of importance rather than subjects.